Case 2201102/2014 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Lemeh v Mr S Mhlekwa (corporate Services manager), South African High Commission, London and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 2201102/2014
- Decision date
- 7 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brown JUDGMENT
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr K Lemeh
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37. It recorded that, by letter dated 16 September 2021, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for non-pursuit.
The reasons state that the claimant had not responded to the Tribunal’s letters dated 3 April 2019, 15 June 2020, or 29 June 2021, and then failed to make any written representations or request a hearing after the September 2021 letter. On that basis, the Tribunal concluded that the claim had not been actively pursued and struck it out. The judgment was issued by Employment Judge Brown on 7 October 2021 and sent to the parties on 8 October 2021.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment struck out the claim under rule 37 because it had not been actively pursued. The Tribunal noted the claimant did not respond to letters dated 3 April 2019, 15 June 2020, or 29 June 2021, and did not make representations or request a hearing after the letter dated 16 September 2021. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.