Case 2201132/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Sonani v Colonnade (Operator) Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 2201132/2019
- Decision date
- 7 December 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Sonani
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningA Rule 21 judgment on liability had been issued because no response was filed. The remedy hearing proceeded in the absence of both parties, with the respondent debarred and the claimant not attending, and the tribunal assessed remedy from the claim form, correspondence, the asserted contract, and other documents on the file.
The tribunal found that the claimant was employed from 6 November 2018 until he resigned with immediate effect on 7 December 2018. His contract provided for an annual gross salary of £38,000, and he had been paid correctly for November but not for 1 December 2018 to 7 December 2018. The tribunal calculated seven days' gross salary as £728.76.
The tribunal also considered the claimant's accrued holiday entitlement. Because he resigned without notice, the contractual clause limited his entitlement to no more than the statutory minimum under the Working Time Regulations. Applying the statutory formula, the tribunal calculated payment in lieu of accrued holiday as £358.08. The aggregate gross sum unlawfully deducted from wages was therefore £1,086.84. Claims for loss of earnings from another employer, travel expenses, stress and inconvenience were not recoverable as wages.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 liability judgment had already been issued. This remedy judgment assessed two elements of the unauthorised deduction claim: unpaid salary and payment in lieu of accrued holiday. | Upheld | — | £1,087 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,087
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
7 references- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 27 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Working Time Regulations 1998 Regulation 14
- Working Time Regulations 1998 Regulation 16
- Revenue and Customs Comrs v Stringer [2009] I.C.R. 985
- Witley & District Mens Club v Mackay [2001] IRLR 595
- Working Time Regulations 1998 Regulation 35(1)(a)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.