Case 2201148/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Flint v Boots Management Services Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2201148/2022
- Decision date
- 23 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Appearances For
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Flint
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt an open preliminary hearing, the tribunal considered whether the claimant's unfair dismissal claim had been brought within the statutory three-month time limit.
The tribunal found that the claim was not brought within the time limit in section 111(2)(a) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It also found that it had been reasonably practicable for the claimant to bring the claim within that time limit, so the unfair dismissal claim was out of time and was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed at an open preliminary hearing because it was presented out of time under section 111(2)(a) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to bring it within the time limit. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 111(2)(a) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.