Case 2201172/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss W Kieryl v Notting Hill Roastery Ltd and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 2201172/2019
- Decision date
- 6 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss W Kieryl
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 6 November 2019, Employment Judge A M Snelson heard the claimant in person at London Central. Neither respondent appeared or was represented. The tribunal recorded that Notting Hill Roastery Ltd had been dissolved, so the claim against that company was dismissed.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's claim against Delish by Linda Ltd under the Working Time Regulations 1998 for compensation for annual leave entitlement outstanding on termination of employment. It ordered Delish by Linda Ltd to pay £1,402.80.
The tribunal also noted that income tax and national insurance contributions may be payable on the award. If so, payment of the net sum after appropriate deductions would discharge the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The claim was brought under the Working Time Regulations 1998 for outstanding annual leave on termination. The tribunal dismissed the claim against Notting Hill Roastery Ltd because that company had been dissolved, but found the claim well-founded against Delish by Linda Ltd and ordered compensation. | Upheld | — | £1,403 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,403
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,403
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.