Case 2201176/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Davies v Omega Pharma Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2201176/2022
- Decision date
- 25 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davidson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Davies
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 13 October 2022, the tribunal gave Ms Davies an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on whether the claim should be struck out. The stated grounds were that the proceedings had been conducted in a scandalous, unreasonable or vexatious manner, that the claimant had not complied with the tribunal's orders dated 1 June 2022, that the claim had not been actively pursued, and that it was no longer possible to have a fair hearing because case management orders had not been complied with and a nine-day hearing was listed for January/February 2023.
Ms Davies did not make written representations or request a hearing in response to that letter. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. It also recorded that the hearing listed for 31 January to 10 February 2023 would not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment strikes out the claim. It does not identify the underlying claim type(s) in the extracted text. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.