Case 2201179/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R M Ghenea v SGL Labs Limited (formerly Solitaire Gemmological Laboratories Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2201179/2020
- Decision date
- 1 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Norris
- Venue
- Central London
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R M Ghenea
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs R M Ghenea worked for SGL Labs Limited from 11 September 2017 until the end of December 2019, after tendering her resignation in September 2019. She brought a claim in February 2020 for unpaid December 2019 wages, the employer pension contribution for that month, and pay for two Sundays worked on 24 November and 15 December 2019.
The Respondent’s ET3 asserted that it had detected “manulpaltion” of attendance records, said it had deducted £1,770 from the Claimant’s final payment and paid a balance of £82.16, and asked for time to file a report. It did not comply with subsequent tribunal orders, did not produce the promised report, and did not appear at the hearing. The tribunal therefore relied on the Claimant’s documents and evidence, including her contracts, travel card records, WhatsApp logs, a covert recording with Mr Chirag Soni on 2 January 2020, and her payslip evidence.
The tribunal accepted that there was no supporting evidence that the Claimant had failed to attend work as alleged. It found that the evidence pointed the other way and noted that Mr Soni said on 2 January 2020 that he had no complaint about her work and described it as “a wonderful… a fantastic… an excellent job”. The tribunal also found that the Claimant had given valid notice on 18 September 2019, had not been in breach of contract, and that the Respondent therefore should not have made deductions from her December 2019 pay.
On remedy, the tribunal ordered payment of £1,700 gross for December 2019 salary, £35.64 for the pension contribution, and £156.92 for two days’ overtime at £78.46 per day. It also ordered £82.71 under section 24(2) ERA 1996 for the day’s holiday the Claimant had to take to attend the hearing, and gave credit for £86.92 already received towards December pay. The total amount ordered payable without deduction was £1,888.35.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Single unlawful deductions from wages claim. The tribunal awarded December 2019 gross pay of £1,700, employer pension contribution of £35.64, and £156.92 for two days' overtime, then added £82.71 under section 24(2) ERA 1996 and credited £86.92 already received, producing a total payable figure of £1,888.35 without deduction. | Upheld | — | £1,888 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,888
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 24(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 12A Employment Tribunals Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.