Case 2201180/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A E Garcia Mendez v Total Care Facilities Ltd (In Voluntary Liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2201180/2022
- Decision date
- 5 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A E Garcia Mendez
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not enter a response to the claim, and the Secretary of State did not indicate an intention to take part in the proceedings. The tribunal therefore entered judgment for the claimant under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of arrears of pay and ordered payment of £1,122.66 gross. It also found an unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of holiday pay and ordered payment of £1,924.56 gross.
The tribunal further found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract, in respect of notice, and ordered payment of £534.60 gross. The total ordered to be paid to the claimant was £3,581.82 gross.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction for arrears of pay. | Upheld | — | £1,123 |
| Holiday pay | Unauthorised deduction for holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £1,925 |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £535 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,582
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.