Case 2201190/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Aksoy v Russell & Bromley Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2201190/2021
- Decision date
- 2 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Aksoy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal refused the claimant's application dated 11 May 2022 for reconsideration of the judgment sent to the parties on 2 February 2022. It held there was no reasonable prospect of the original decision being varied or revoked.
The reasons given were that the claimant's application came from the same email address used throughout the proceedings, and that the tribunal had sent orders to that address on 4 October and 10 December without response. The 10 December order warned that the claim could be struck out, and a further strike-out warning was sent on 19 January, so the claimant had time to respond before the judgment was issued.
The tribunal also noted that the respondent had made efforts to contact the claimant by email at the same address, and that the claimant accepted he had made no contact with the tribunal between August 2021 and April 2022. No monetary remedy was addressed in this reconsideration judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The claimant's application dated 11 May 2022 for reconsideration was refused under rule 72. The judgment does not reproduce the underlying February 2022 merits decision. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.