Case 2201207/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v UBS Asset Management (UK) Ltd and others — 2020
- Case reference
- 2201207/2020
- Decision date
- 19 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicolle JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a short order on withdrawal. The Claimant’s claims against the Second to Sixth Respondents were withdrawn on the basis of the agreement between the Claimant and the First Respondent recorded in paragraph 1 of the Agreed List of Issues dated 11 June 2020. The tribunal recorded that those claims were withdrawn and dismissed.
The First Respondent, UBS AG, accepted that its disclosure obligations extend to the disclosure obligations that would have applied to the Second to Sixth Respondents had the Claimant not withdrawn those claims. The judgment also records, for the avoidance of doubt, that the claim against the First Respondent proceeds.
The Respondents confirmed that no application for costs had been made in relation to the claims against the Second to Sixth Respondents, and the tribunal stated that no order for costs would be made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claims against the Second to Sixth Respondents were withdrawn by the Claimant on the basis of the agreement recorded in paragraph 1 of the Agreed List of Issues dated 11 June 2020. The judgment states that those claims were withdrawn and dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.