Case 2201222/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Arkadin (UK) Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2201222/2020
- Decision date
- 20 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkin JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance. Employment Judge Adkin considered the ET1 and decided that the claim could properly be determined without a hearing under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The tribunal’s judgment was that the respondent unfairly dismissed the claimant, Mr David Williams. The order records a single compensation figure of £10,297.34 payable by the respondent to the claimant. The judgment does not split that sum between basic award, compensatory award, interest, or any other head of loss.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The respondent did not file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance. The claim was determined on the papers under rule 21 without a hearing, and the tribunal held that the claimant was unfairly dismissed. | Upheld | — | £10,297 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,297
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.