Case 2201238/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Ms Chaney, Human Resources Director — 2023
- Case reference
- 2201238/2023
- Decision date
- 19 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge French Appearances
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 19 June 2023 before Employment Judge French, the tribunal dealt with the claimant's unfair dismissal claim and her age and disability discrimination claims as preliminary jurisdiction issues. The respondent was represented by Ms Chaney, Human Resources Director, and the claimant appeared in person.
The unfair dismissal claim was struck out for lack of jurisdiction because it had been presented out of time and had not been presented within a further reasonable period. The tribunal also struck out the age discrimination and disability discrimination claims for lack of jurisdiction because they were presented out of time and it was not just and equitable in all the circumstances to extend time.
The claimant's application to amend the claim to add an unauthorised deduction from wages claim in relation to sick pay was refused. The tribunal recorded that the proposed claim would have been out of time even if it had been included in the original claim form. No monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out for lack of jurisdiction because it was presented out of time and not presented within a further reasonable period. | Struck out | — | — |
| Age discrimination | Struck out for lack of jurisdiction because it was presented out of time and it was not just and equitable in all the circumstances to extend time. | Struck out | Age | — |
| Disability discrimination | Struck out for lack of jurisdiction because it was presented out of time and it was not just and equitable in all the circumstances to extend time. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.