Case 2201263/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Zadrozny v Pereira AND Ironbark Design & Construct Limited At Central London — 2020
- Case reference
- 2201263/2020
- Decision date
- 5 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicolle Judgement
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Zadrozny
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 26 June 2020 Employment Judge Nicolle accepted the respondent’s application for reconsideration of the judgment that had been sent to the parties on 5 June 2020. The tribunal held that the original judgment had failed to take account of wages paid in the period from 1 to 15 October 2019.
The reconsideration amended the judgment by adding a new paragraph 3 and revising paragraph 5 so that the claimant’s entitlement was stated as an aggregate gross sum covering both accrued holiday pay and unpaid wages. The extracted text records the correction to the calculation but does not state the revised monetary figure.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The reconsideration decision states that the original judgment failed to take account of wages paid in the period 1 to 15 October 2019 and that paragraph 5 was amended to reflect the aggregate gross sum due for unpaid wages and accrued holiday pay. The extracted text does not state the unpaid wages figure separately. | Upheld | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The reconsideration decision records that the amended paragraph 5 reflected the aggregate gross sum due for accrued holiday pay as well as unpaid wages. The extracted text does not state the holiday pay figure separately. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.