Case 2201309/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms T Jauhal v Aiz Consulting Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2201309/2019
- Decision date
- 4 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A James Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms T Jauhal
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs T Jauhal worked for AIZ Consulting Ltd as an English Language Instructor under a contract for €1200 per month and 20 hours per week during term time. At the hearing she also raised matters about leaving her flat in Italy, advances, a hospital appointment and a flight, but the tribunal said those matters, together with the loan issue, were outside its jurisdiction. The tribunal therefore dealt only with unpaid wages and holiday pay.
On wages, the tribunal accepted that October to December 2018 had been paid correctly and then worked through the January to March 2019 payments against the contract rate, the hours worked, sickness absence and leave taken. It found that the claimant had been paid €2493.39 for that period against €2304.60 due, so no wages were owed. The currency conversion point also produced only a small shortfall of less than £5 over five months, which did not change the conclusion.
On holiday pay, the tribunal held that the claimant had been paid her usual salary during leave and had taken 12 days' holiday during the relevant period, against a proportionate entitlement of 11.67 days for five months' service. It found that she was therefore not owed any further holiday pay before her employment ended on 1 March 2019. Both the unpaid wages claim and the holiday pay claim were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.