Case 2201333/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Traishe v Canova Clinic (Mayfair) Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2201333/2023
- Decision date
- 18 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Emery
- Venue
- London Central
- Panel members
- Ms D Olulode, Mr J Carroll
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Traishe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the claimant succeeded on her wages complaint. It found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay commission in October and November 2022, and ordered the respondent to pay £1,656, described in the judgment as the gross sum deducted.
The claimant’s complaint that she had been subjected to detriment and dismissal for making a protected disclosure was found not well-founded and was dismissed. The judgment records that the respondent had failed to provide the claimant with her certificates of training and competencies, which the tribunal found concerning, and that during the hearing the respondent agreed to provide her with all of her original certificates.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent failed to pay commission for October and November 2022; the tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and awarded the gross sum deducted. | Upheld | — | £1,656 |
| Whistleblowing | The complaint of detriment and dismissal for making a protected disclosure was dismissed as not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,656
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.