Case 2201338/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Shah-Hosseini v Stonebeach Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2201338/2019
- Decision date
- 18 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Shah-Hosseini
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss S Shah-Hosseini presented a claim form on 11 April 2019 complaining of unfair dismissal, racial discrimination, and unpaid wages. The respondents did not present a response and it later emerged that they were in administration; the administration ended on 29 October 2019 and the respondents were in liquidation.
By letter of 19 July 2021 the Tribunal advised the claimant that the respondents were in liquidation and asked whether she wished to proceed to a hearing. The claimant did not reply. The reasons then record that a letter dated 13 August 2007 was sent inviting her to show cause why the claim should not be struck out for non-pursuit; no reply was received. The chronology in that date is unclear from the extracted text, but the outcome recorded is plain.
Pursuant to rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, the Tribunal struck out the claim form on the ground that it had not been actively pursued. The reasons also refer to rule 18(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2004. There was no merits determination of the unfair dismissal, race discrimination, or unpaid wages complaints, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claim form was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued. The reasons also refer to rule 18(1)(d) of the 2004 Rules. | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The racial discrimination complaint was included in the claim form presented on 11 April 2019 and was struck out with the rest of the claim form for non-pursuit. No merits determination was made. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The unpaid wages complaint was included in the claim form and was struck out with the rest of the claim form for not being actively pursued. No wage award was made. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(d) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- rule 18(1)(d) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2004
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.