Case 2201349/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Hatch-Kiwanuka v Future Academies — 2020
- Case reference
- 2201349/2020
- Decision date
- 23 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Panel members
- Ms S Campbell, Ms L Jones
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Hatch-Kiwanuka
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal sat at London Central on 27-28 September 2021 before Employment Judge A M Snelson, with Ms S Campbell and Ms L Jones as members. Mr B Mitchell appeared for the respondents and there was no appearance or representation for the claimant. The tribunal unanimously held that the claimant's unfair dismissal complaint was well-founded, but it found that she was not entitled to recover any compensation for that claim.
The tribunal also upheld the claimant's uncontested complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages, recording an underpayment totalling £10.71 and ordering the respondents to pay that sum. It dismissed all other claims brought by the claimant. In the extracted judgment those other claims are not itemised individually.
The tribunal confirmed a previously proposed costs award of £2,500, made by a differently constituted tribunal after the hearing on 23 November 2020, and ordered the claimant to pay that sum to the respondents under rule 76(2) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. It made no order on the respondents' separate costs application, which was left to separate directions.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the complaint well-founded but stated that the claimant was not entitled to recover any compensation. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | An uncontested complaint of underpayment was upheld for £10.71. | Upheld | — | £11 |
| Race discrimination | The extracted judgment does not identify the dismissed claims individually; this entry is mapped from the case listing category and the tribunal's statement that all other claims were dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- r76(2) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.