Case 2201350/2019 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Ms N Nze, Managing Director — 2019
- Case reference
- 2201350/2019
- Decision date
- 21 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davidson Appearances
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing in London Central on 19 August 2019, before Employment Judge Davidson, the tribunal ordered IELTS Medical Limited to pay Miss G McSkimming £36.00 in respect of arrears of pay and holiday pay. The written record does not separate that sum between the two heads of claim.
The document is a brief written record of decision and does not set out substantive reasons on liability beyond the order itself. It notes that written reasons would not be provided unless a written request was made within 14 days of the sending of the record.
No discrimination, dismissal, or other substantive findings are recorded in the written decision provided. The only monetary remedy stated is the combined award of £36.00.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written record orders payment of £36.00 in respect of arrears of pay and holiday pay, but it does not split the figure between those heads of claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The written record orders payment of £36.00 in respect of arrears of pay and holiday pay, but it does not identify a separate amount for holiday pay. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £36
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.