Case 2201355/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Y A Wong v Consulting Professionals Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2201355/2022
- Decision date
- 30 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Representation Claimant
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Y A Wong
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at London Central by video on 30 May 2022 before Employment Judge A Jack. The claimant, Ms S Y A Wong, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by its director, Mr Riaz.
The written judgment records a single finding: the respondent made an unlawful deduction from the claimant's wages. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £32.15 net in respect of the amount unlawfully deducted.
The judgment notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's note. No additional factual findings or legal analysis are set out in the written record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent made an unlawful deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £32.15 net. | Upheld | — | £32 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £32
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.