Case 2201386/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Polak, Claimant’s Sister For the v Mr L Hysa, Director — 2019
- Case reference
- 2201386/2019
- Decision date
- 21 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Norris
- Venue
- Central London
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Polak, Claimant’s Sister For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 21 August 2019, Employment Judge Norris sitting alone heard the matter at Central London Employment Tribunal. By consent, the Respondent was ordered to pay the Claimant a net sum of £400 by direct transfer into his bank account or by other suitable means.
The order also recorded the Respondent's agreement to ensure that the Claimant's HMRC tax records were corrected to reflect the amounts actually paid to him, including the sum paid under the judgment, and to gross up the net sum so that any deductions required to be made could be accounted for to HMRC. The supplied text contains no substantive findings on liability and does not separate the payment between individual claims.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The order was made by consent. The supplied judgment text does not identify the underlying claim type(s), so this is classified as other. | Settled | — | £400 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £400
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.