Case 2201393/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Wolfco CP One Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2201393/2020
- Decision date
- 6 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkin JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Respondent did not file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance. Employment Judge Adkin therefore determined the claim on the papers under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, without a hearing.
On that basis, the Tribunal found that the Respondent had unlawfully deducted the claimant’s wages pursuant to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, had failed to pay notice pay in breach of contract, and had failed to pay holiday pay. No separate findings beyond those stated in the judgment were recorded in the extracted text.
The Tribunal ordered payment of three sums: £1,350.05 for unlawful deduction from wages, £2,077.00 for notice pay, and £311.55 for unpaid holiday pay. The judgment records that the wage and holiday pay sums were to be paid net of tax and national insurance.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Tribunal held that the Respondent unlawfully deducted wages pursuant to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The award was ordered to be paid net of tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £1,350 |
| Breach of contract | The Tribunal found that the Respondent failed to pay notice pay in breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £2,077 |
| Holiday pay | The Tribunal found that the Respondent failed to pay holiday pay. The award was ordered to be paid net of tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £312 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,739
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.