Case 2201419/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Catalina and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 2201419/2019
- Decision date
- 3 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Norris
- Venue
- Central London
Parties
3 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not appear and was not represented. Employment Judge Norris, sitting alone, found that the respondent had made one or more deductions from the claimant's wages in contravention of section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £1,726.20 for the unlawful deductions. It also found that the claimant sustained financial loss of £103.16 attributable to the deductions and ordered payment of that further sum under section 24(2) Employment Rights Act 1996. The total payable was £1,829.36, without deduction.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment awards £1,726.20 for deductions from wages and a further £103.16 for financial loss attributable to those deductions, giving a total of £1,829.36 for the claim. | Upheld | — | £1,829 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,829
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 24(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.