Case 2201481/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Miah v Icc UK and 2 others — 2022
- Case reference
- 2201481/2022
- Decision date
- 12 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davidson Representation
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr I Miah
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a remote CVP hearing on 12 April 2022 before Employment Judge Davidson. Mr I Miah appeared in person, and the respondents were represented by counsel. The judgment records that the hearing was consented to by the parties and that no face-to-face hearing was held because it was not practicable.
The tribunal considered an application for interim relief linked to the complaint to which the application related. It held that it was not likely that, on determining that complaint, the tribunal would find that the reason or principal reason for the claimant’s dismissal was the reason specified in s103A ERA 1996.
Because that statutory threshold was not met, the tribunal decided that interim relief was not appropriate in this case. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Interim relief application refused; the tribunal held it was not likely to find that the reason or principal reason for dismissal was the s103A ERA 1996 reason. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s103A ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.