Case 2201482/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Dale Perini (in person) For the v Modulous (Lewisham) Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2201482/2024
- Decision date
- 28 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gidney Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Dale Perini (in person) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was dealt with at a Rule 21 preliminary hearing on 9 May 2024 after the respondent failed to present a response or attend. The claimant, Mr Dale Perini, gave evidence in person. The tribunal sent the claim to the respondent on 27 February 2024 and a hearing notice to its address, but there was no attendance from the respondent.
The tribunal found that under clause 3.1 of the claimant's contract of employment dated 21 March 2022, he was entitled to three months' notice of termination. It accepted that the respondent summarily dismissed him on 1 December 2023. On that basis, the claimant was entitled to notice pay.
The tribunal recorded the claimant's net monthly pay as £5,370.92. Multiplying that by the contractual three-month notice period produced an award of £16,112.76, which was the sum ordered on the claim for notice pay.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held that clause 3.1 of the contract dated 21 March 2022 entitled the claimant to three months' notice. The respondent summarily dismissed him on 1 December 2023, and the tribunal awarded three months' net notice pay. | Upheld | — | £16,113 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £16,113
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.