Case 2201488/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Abasto Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2201488/2024
- Decision date
- 24 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ms
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a response and did not attend the hearing. It said the company was in liquidation, but had not identified a liquidator. The tribunal noted previous preliminary hearings and its own inquiries, and was satisfied from Companies House information that the respondent was not in compulsory liquidation, so it proceeded with the case.
On the evidence before it, including the claimant's evidence on oath, the tribunal found that he had not been paid his salary for November 2023 after the respondent's premises was suddenly locked shut on 4 December 2023. It also found that he had not been paid for 9.5 days of untaken holiday at the end of his employment. The tribunal therefore held that the claimant's complaint under section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, comprising unlawful deductions within section 13, was well-founded and succeeded.
The tribunal ordered payment of £1,335.36 net unpaid wages for November 2023 and £1,045.00 net holiday pay for 9.5 days untaken leave. It also ordered statutory redundancy pay. In calculating that sum, the tribunal recorded the claimant's date of birth as 20 September 1977, his employment from 9 September 2017 to 4 December 2023, his weekly pay as £385.61, and applied 6 completed years at the relevant rate to reach £3,470.76.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Included £1,335.36 net unpaid wages for November 2023 and £1,045.00 net for 9.5 days' untaken holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £2,380 |
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy pay was calculated by the tribunal at £3,470.76 using 6 completed years and a weekly pay figure of £385.61. | Upheld | — | £3,471 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,851
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.23 ERA 1996
- s.13 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.