Case 2201507/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Hinds v Lewis Boddington and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 2201507/2020
- Decision date
- 30 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Welch Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr D Hinds
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr D Hinds’ complaints of unlawful deductions from wages were found well founded against Lewis Boddington, the First Respondent. The tribunal held that sums were due in relation to two invoices and ordered payment of the net amounts claimed.
The order was for a total net sum of £3,192, comprising £1,848 relating to invoice number 4 dated 25 November 2019 and £1,344 relating to invoice number 5 dated 9 December 2019. The judgment records no separate award against the Second Respondent and no further reasoning beyond the finding that the unlawful deduction claims succeeded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint succeeded against the First Respondent only. The tribunal ordered payment of the net sum of £3,192, made up of £1,848 for invoice 4 dated 25 November 2019 and £1,344 for invoice 5 dated 9 December 2019. | Upheld | — | £3,192 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,192
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.