Case 2201513/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms R Titmarsh v Ngosa Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2201513/2020
- Decision date
- 10 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Isaacson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms R Titmarsh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Isaacson recorded that terms of settlement had been agreed and that the claimant withdrew all of her claims. The judgment therefore dismissed all of the claimant's claims under rule 52. No liability findings or remedy awards were made.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal after settlement; no merits determination is recorded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal after settlement; no merits determination is recorded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal after settlement; no merits determination is recorded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal after settlement; no merits determination is recorded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal after settlement; no merits determination is recorded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal after settlement; no merits determination is recorded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.