Case 2201525/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Quadros v Your Management Ltd (In Liquidation) — 2019
- Case reference
- 2201525/2019
- Decision date
- 10 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Grewal Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Quadros
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the London Central Employment Tribunal on 10 September 2019, before Employment Judge Grewal, the claimant, Mr R Quadros, appeared in person and the respondent did not appear. The tribunal dealt with three claims arising from the employment dispute: unfair dismissal, unauthorised deductions from wages, and breach of contract.
The unfair dismissal complaint was struck out. The judgment does not set out written reasons for that outcome, stating only that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was found well-founded, and the respondent was ordered to pay £1,887. The complaint of breach of contract was also found well-founded, with a further award of £201.09. The written record does not break the awards down further or record any separate interest component.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the complaint. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was found well-founded, and the respondent was ordered to pay £1,887. | Upheld | — | £1,887 |
| Breach of contract | The complaint of breach of contract was found well-founded, and the respondent was ordered to pay £201.09. | Upheld | — | £201 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,088
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.