Case 2201539/2021 · Employment Tribunal
v Mr. P. Tanczoz v Tetra Tech Management Services Ltd. — 2021
- Case reference
- 2201539/2021
- Decision date
- 18 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Beyzade Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
v Mr. P. Tanczoz
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 19 November 2021 before Employment Judge B Beyzade, the tribunal dealt only with the claimant's age discrimination claim. The judgment records that this claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was therefore dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The tribunal did not determine the remaining claims in this judgment. It stated that the remainder of the claimant's claims would continue to the final hearing listed for four days from 21 February 2021. No liability findings or monetary remedy were recorded in the written reasons attached to this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The age discrimination claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.