Case 2201550/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v TDA Capital Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2201550/2020
- Decision date
- 28 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicolle JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Respondent did not file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance by the deadline of 26 June 2020 and did not seek an extension of time. Employment Judge Nicolle therefore determined the claim without a hearing under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, on the basis of the ET1 and the documents before the Tribunal.
The Tribunal found that the Respondent had unlawfully failed to pay the Claimant's wages for the period between 21 October 2019 and 10 February 2020, in the gross sum of £18,461.40. It also found that the Claimant had accrued but untaken holiday entitlement of 5.5 days. Using an annual gross salary of £60,000, the Tribunal calculated a daily rate of £164.38 and a holiday payment of £904.11.
The Tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay the Claimant a total of £19,365.51 for unpaid wages and accrued holiday entitlement. The judgment states that payments are to be made gross, with the Claimant responsible for applicable tax and employee National Insurance contributions.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Tribunal found that the Respondent had unlawfully failed to pay wages for the period 21 October 2019 to 10 February 2020. | Upheld | — | £18,461 |
| Holiday pay | The Tribunal found the Claimant was entitled to payment for 5.5 days of accrued but untaken holiday, calculated using a daily rate of £164.38 based on a gross annual salary of £60,000. | Upheld | — | £904 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £19,366
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.