Case 2201572/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms. Ewa Chaplin v Stablegold Ltd. — 2023
- Case reference
- 2201572/2022
- Decision date
- 25 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkin Appearances
- Venue
- London Central ET in person
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms. Ewa Chaplin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a record of preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Adkin at London Central on 25 January 2023. The Claimant did not attend. The Respondent was represented by counsel.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | Automatically struck out under the Tribunal's order dated 18 October 2022 for failure to comply with paragraphs 6(a) and 6(c) of the Case Management Order dated 19 July 2022. | Struck out | Age | — |
| Race discrimination | Automatically struck out under the Tribunal's order dated 18 October 2022 for failure to comply with paragraphs 6(a) and 6(c) of the Case Management Order dated 19 July 2022. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Redundancy | Automatically struck out under the Tribunal's order dated 18 October 2022 for failure to comply with paragraphs 6(a) and 6(c) of the Case Management Order dated 19 July 2022. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Automatically struck out under the Tribunal's order dated 18 October 2022 for failure to comply with paragraphs 6(a) and 6(c) of the Case Management Order dated 19 July 2022. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.