Case 2201606/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Renton, counsel For the v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 2201606/2022
- Decision date
- 30 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Klimov Tribunal
- Panel members
- P Alleyne, D Clay
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr D Renton, counsel For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at London Central by video on 20-24, 27, 28 and 29 March 2023, and on 30 March 2023 in chambers, gave an oral judgment. Its unanimous decision was that the Claimant's claims were not well founded and were dismissed.
The written record does not set out separate findings of fact or legal analysis for each claim. It records only the overall dismissal of the claims, with no award made and no written reasons provided in the absence of a request for reasons at the hearing or within 14 days of the written record being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Disability discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Sex discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.