Case 2201616/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Daniel Omozusi v Robert Kenneth Newmark trading as Beach Blanket Babylon — 2024
- Case reference
- 2201616/2024
- Decision date
- 28 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge H Clark Representation
- Venue
- London Central via Cloud Video Platform
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Daniel Omozusi
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningDaniel Omozusi’s case was heard at London Central via the Cloud Video Platform on 28 May 2024 before Employment Judge H Clark. The respondent, Robert Kenneth Newmark trading as Beach Blanket Babylon, did not appear and did not file a response. The written record states that the judgment was given orally at the hearing and does not include fuller written reasons.
The tribunal found that the respondent unlawfully deducted £2,913.75 from the claimant’s wages. It also found that the respondent unlawfully deducted a further £647 from wages by way of accrued annual leave payments. Both findings were recorded as straightforward monetary awards in favour of the claimant.
In addition, the tribunal awarded £1,286 for the respondent’s failure to provide the claimant with written particulars of employment, described as representing 2 weeks’ pay. The decision does not set out any further reasoning beyond the stated outcomes and amounts. The total sum awarded across the orders recorded in the judgment was £4,846.75.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent unlawfully deducted £2,913.75 from the claimant’s wages. | Upheld | — | £2,914 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent unlawfully deducted £647 from the claimant’s wages by way of accrued annual leave payments. | Upheld | — | £647 |
| Other | The tribunal awarded £1,286 for the respondent’s failure to provide written particulars of employment, stated to represent 2 weeks’ pay. | Upheld | — | £1,286 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,847
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.