Case 2201628/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Ibala v Michael Williams — 2023
- Case reference
- 2201628/2023
- Decision date
- 12 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sent
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Ibala
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a remote public hearing on 12 April 2023, Tribunal Judge Plowright, sitting alone, heard Ms S Ibala's claims against Michael Williams. The judgment records two successful claims for unauthorised deduction of wages: one in relation to arrears of pay and one in relation to holiday pay.
The tribunal held that the arrears-of-pay claim was well founded and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £952. It also held that the holiday-pay claim was well founded and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £462.
The total gross award was £1,414. The tribunal noted that the claimant is responsible for payment of tax and National Insurance on that sum.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unauthorised deduction of wages in relation to arrears of pay was found well founded. | Upheld | — | £952 |
| Holiday pay | Claim for unauthorised deduction of wages in relation to holiday pay was found well founded. | Upheld | — | £462 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,414
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.