Case 2201677/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Parkitna v Burger & Lobster Restaurant Group Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2201677/2022
- Decision date
- 12 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Panel members
- Ms J Grant, Mrs J Cameron
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Parkitna
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal sat at London Central on 11-12 January 2023 before Employment Judge A M Snelson with members Ms J Grant and Mrs J Cameron. It heard submissions from Mr R Russell for the Claimant and Mr M Foster, solicitor, for the Respondents.
The tribunal's unanimous judgment was that the Claimant's complaints of direct (associative) disability discrimination and unfair dismissal were not well-founded. Both claims were therefore dismissed.
The judgment does not set out any separate remedy findings or monetary award, and records that the proceedings were dismissed in full.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment describes this as a complaint of direct (associative) disability discrimination and finds it not well-founded. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the unfair dismissal complaint was not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.