Case 2201678/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Mr A George, senior litigator — 2023
- Case reference
- 2201678/2023
- Decision date
- 10 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 10 May 2023, Employment Judge Khan sitting alone at London Central entered judgment by consent. The order records that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy on 27 January 2023, and that the respondent would pay 8 weeks' redundancy pay of £8,461.54 gross and 8 weeks' notice pay of £8,461.64 gross within 28 days.
The same order records unauthorised deductions from wages on 10 January and 10 February 2023 totalling £3,922 gross. It also records that the holiday pay claim was dismissed because the claimant withdrew it. A footnote explains that a net figure of £6,457.60 had been discussed and agreed for the notice pay, but the gross figure was used because the award is fully taxable and subject to national insurance deductions.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Settled | — | £8,462 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay was awarded by consent; the judgment does not separately label the underlying claim. | Settled | — | £8,462 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Settled | — | £3,922 |
| Holiday pay | Claim dismissed on the claimant's withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £20,845
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.