Case 2201685/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms B Solomons v Athene New Build Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2201685/2020
- Decision date
- 23 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smailes
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms B Solomons
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Solomons was employed by Athene New Build Limited from 28 April 2018 until 29 December 2019. The tribunal found that the parties did not agree in 2019 to replace the existing team commission structure with a discretionary bonus scheme, and that the respondent did not validly vary or withdraw the commission terms under clause 7. On that basis, the claimant remained entitled to 2019 team commission despite her dismissal, which was not for misconduct or gross misconduct.
On the bonus issue, the tribunal found that Mr Stone awarded a discretionary bonus of £20,000 by email on 20 December 2019 in recognition of work done in 2019. Applying the approach in Farrell Matthews, it held that once the bonus was awarded it crystallised as wages; it was not conditional on the claimant remaining employed in 2020 or on written acceptance. The respondent's failure to pay the £5,000 due in the week commencing 23 December 2019 and the £15,000 balance was therefore an unlawful deduction from wages, alternatively a breach of contract.
On commission, the tribunal accepted the claimant's case that the relevant 2019 team commission terms continued to apply and that the claimant's full entitlement had not been paid. It accepted the claimant's figure of £9,591.15 and found that sum remained payable on termination. The tribunal awarded £20,000 for the bonus and £9,591.15 for commission, both gross and subject to deductions for tax and National Insurance, with alternative findings of breach of contract for each sum.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Bonus of £20,000; the tribunal held the bonus crystallised as wages when awarded and was payable despite termination. | Upheld | — | £20,000 |
| Breach of contract | Alternative basis for the bonus claim only; the tribunal made no separate monetary award on this head. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | 2019 team commission; the tribunal held the commission terms were never validly changed and the claimant remained entitled to payment after dismissal. | Upheld | — | £9,591 |
| Breach of contract | Alternative basis for the commission claim only; the tribunal made no separate monetary award on this head. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £29,591
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
7 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.27(1)(a) ERA 1996
- Bear Scotland v Fulton
- Clark v Nomura International Plc
- IBM UK Holdings Ltd v Dalgleish
- Farrell Matthews & Weir v Hansen
- Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.