Case 2201687/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Evolution Corporate Acquisitions Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2201687/2020
- Decision date
- 23 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicolle JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not file an ET3 by the deadline and had not applied for an extension of time. Employment Judge Nicolle therefore determined the claim on the papers under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, without a hearing.
The tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay wages to the claimant for the period 1 January 2020 to 13 March 2020 in the gross sum of £17,666. It also recorded a further gross sum of £12,395 said to be owed because the claimant had relied on oral representations made by the respondent’s CEO before he started employment, relating to arrears of pay from June and July 2019 at Orwell Group Holding Ltd.
The tribunal further calculated accrued holiday entitlement for the employment between 12 September 2019 and 13 March 2020. On the figures stated, the claimant had taken 11.5 days of 33 days’ annual entitlement, leaving 5 days accrued; using an annual gross salary of £85,000 this produced a daily rate of £232.88 and a holiday value of £1,164.40. The final order records £30,061, which matches the two wage sums and does not separately add the holiday figure, so the extracted text contains an internal arithmetic inconsistency.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determined on the papers under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to file an ET3. The judgment records unpaid wages of £17,666 for 1 January 2020 to 13 March 2020 and a further £12,395 said to be owed because of oral representations made before employment. It also separately calculates accrued holiday entitlement at £1,164.40, but the final order records £30,061, which matches the two wage sums and does not separately add the holiday figure. | Upheld | — | £30,061 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £30,061
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.