Mr M Olatunji v Urban MBA — 2024

Case reference: 2201703/2024
Decision date: 20 June 2024
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Khan

Indexed: 17 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr M Olatunji

Respondent

Urban MBA

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The respondent failed to file an ET3. Employment Judge Khan considered the ET1 and decided that the claim could properly be determined without a hearing under Rule 21.

The tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay the claimant wages totaling GBP 10,084.65 gross. The respondent was ordered to pay that gross sum, subject to deductions for tax and national insurance for which the respondent should account to HMRC.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	Rule 21 judgment after the respondent failed to file an ET3; the judgment states unpaid wages totaling GBP 10,084.65 gross.	Upheld	—	£10,085

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £10,085; across all upheld claims

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.