Case 2201712/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R O’Dair, Counsel For the v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 2201712/2019
- Decision date
- 14 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkin
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr R O’Dair, Counsel For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records a hearing at London Central on 14 January 2020 before Employment Judge Adkin sitting alone. The parties were represented by counsel for both sides. The decision is a short disposal judgment rather than a reasons judgment.
The only substantive disposal recorded is that all claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. The judgment does not set out any findings on liability, credibility, or remedy, and it does not identify the individual pleaded claims in the body of the decision.
Because the judgment gives no merits findings, there is no award and no legal test applied in the text. The disposition is limited to withdrawal and dismissal of the claims.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The judgment states that all claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. The individual claim type is taken from the case listing rather than the judgment text, which does not identify the pleaded claims separately. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that all claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. The individual claim type is taken from the case listing rather than the judgment text, which does not identify the pleaded claims separately. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment states that all claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. The individual claim type is taken from the case listing rather than the judgment text, which does not identify the pleaded claims separately. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that all claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. The individual claim type is taken from the case listing rather than the judgment text, which does not identify the pleaded claims separately. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that all claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. The individual claim type is taken from the case listing rather than the judgment text, which does not identify the pleaded claims separately. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.