Case 2201715/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. N. Taylor v Bark & Birch Ltd (In Compulsory Liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2201715/2022
- Decision date
- 8 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Burns
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. N. Taylor
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment after Bark & Birch Ltd failed to file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance and did not respond to the tribunal's email of 31 May 2022. Employment Judge E Burns decided the claim could properly be determined without a hearing.
The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant money owed to him, namely £2,166 for salary for March 2022 and £5,841 for commissions and incentives for January, February and March 2022. The judgment records that these sums were due to the claimant and had not been paid.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay a total of £8,007 and to account to HMRC for any tax and national insurance due on that amount. The listed hearing on 9 June 2022 was vacated and the parties were told not to attend.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment on the papers. The respondent did not file an ET3 or respond to the tribunal's email of 31 May 2022. | Upheld | — | £8,007 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,007
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.