Case 2201716/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Mark Litchfield v Chiswick Glass Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2201716/2023
- Decision date
- 18 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Richard Wood
- Venue
- CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Mark Litchfield
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by CVP on 18 May 2023 before Employment Judge Richard Wood. The claimant, Mr Mark Litchfield, appeared in person. The respondent, Chiswick Glass Limited, did not attend and was not represented.
The tribunal allowed the claimant's claim for redundancy payment and awarded £11,420 net. It also allowed the claim for unpaid notice pay and awarded £6,069.83 net.
The tribunal further allowed the claim for unpaid holiday pay and awarded £115 net. The judgment records the total owed to the claimant as £17,604.83.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal allowed the claim for redundancy payment and awarded £11,420 net. | Upheld | — | £11,420 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal allowed the claim for unpaid notice pay and awarded £6,069.83 net. | Upheld | — | £6,070 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal allowed the claim for unpaid holiday pay and awarded £115 net. | Upheld | — | £115 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £17,605
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.