Case 2201721/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Treend (Litigation Friend) For the v Not attending — 2023
- Case reference
- 2201721/2023
- Decision date
- 14 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gidney
- Panel members
- Mr Alleyne, Mr Harrington Roberts
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Treend (Litigation Friend) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the claimant's complaint of unlawful deduction from wages under s13 and s23 ERA 1996 was well founded. It recorded that the hearing had previously been listed before Employment Judge Norris on 26 June 2023, that the respondent did not attend the 14 August 2023 hearing, and that the respondent had emailed on 8 August 2023 saying it understood the outstanding wages of £579.50 had been paid. The claimant said no payment had been received and that the banking details in the respondent's email were correct, so judgment was entered for the unpaid wages.
The tribunal then considered whether to make an additional award under s24(2) ERA 1996. It found that the respondent had kept the claimant out of her wages since the June hearing and had had the benefit of those wages for about a year. The claimant had found new employment in November 2022 and had relied on family support in the interim. The tribunal assessed further compensation for financial loss at £133.73, equivalent to one week's net pay, producing a total judgment sum of £713.23.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal entered judgment for the outstanding wages of £579.50. It separately awarded £133.73 under s24(2) ERA 1996 for financial loss attributable to the withholding of wages. | Upheld | — | £580 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £713
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £134
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.23 ERA 1996
- s.24(2) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.