Case 2201730/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Armstrong v Outplayed World Wide Services Ltd (previously known as Profit Accumulator Services Ltd) Heard via Cloud Video Platform (London Central) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2201730/2023
- Decision date
- 25 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davidson Representation
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting remotely by Cloud Video Platform on 25 April 2023, determined the claimant's breach of contract complaint. Employment Judge Davidson recorded that the claimant, Mr T Armstrong, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr J Granite, Chairman.
The only substantive outcome recorded in the written judgment is that the claimant's complaint of breach of contract succeeded. No further factual findings or legal reasoning are set out in the extracted record, and no other claims are identified.
As a remedy, the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £2,500 gross, described in the judgment as equating to a net payment of £2,200. The written record also states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held that the claimant's complaint of breach of contract succeeded and ordered the respondent to pay £2,500 gross, equating to a net payment of £2,200. | Upheld | — | £2,500 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,500
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.