Case 2201749/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms. H Burks v Net Communications Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2201749/2020
- Decision date
- 2 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wade Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms. H Burks
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance. REJ Wade therefore determined the claim on the ET1 alone under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013, without a hearing.
The tribunal found that the respondent made Ms H Burks redundant without following the procedure prescribed by the Trade Union and Labour Relations Act 1992. On that basis, the tribunal held that a protective award was payable.
The tribunal ordered Net Communications Ltd to pay Ms Burks £3,000 and to account to HMRC for any tax and national insurance due on that amount.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment says the respondent made the claimant redundant without following the procedure prescribed by the Trade Union and Labour Relations Act 1992, and that a protective award was payable. The taxonomy does not contain a specific protective award category. | Upheld | — | £3,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.