Case 2201760/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Mr A Ruber and Aquarium Management Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2201760/2020
- Decision date
- 19 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Norris
- Venue
- Central London
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought claims for statutory redundancy pay and statutory notice pay following dismissal. The respondents did not file an ET3 and did not attend the hearing. Employment Judge Norris proceeded in their absence. The tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence that he started work on 15 April 1996. It found that the second respondent was not incorporated until 6 April 2000, that a letter dated 12 February 2020 stating he had been employed by the second respondent continuously for 24 years was erroneous, and that because his wages were paid by the second respondent, the second respondent should be added as a party and the respondents held jointly and severally liable.
On the merits, the tribunal found that the claimant was told at a meeting on 12 February 2020 that he was being made redundant and that no dismissal process was followed. Even if 22 January 2020 were taken as the effective date of termination, the judge applied section 97 ERA 1996 and added 12 weeks' statutory notice, producing a deemed EDT of 15 April 2020 and giving the claimant 24 years' service. The claimant was therefore entitled to 12 weeks' notice pay, calculated at £3,156 net (£3,600 gross), and statutory redundancy pay of £8,850. The total ordered to be paid was £12,006 without deduction.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Statutory notice pay / notice entitlement; the tribunal said the claimant was entitled to 12 weeks' notice or pay in lieu, calculated at £3,156 net (£3,600 gross). | Upheld | — | £3,156 |
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment calculated as 29 weeks' pay at £300 gross, payable without deduction. | Upheld | — | £8,850 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,006
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.97 ERA 1996
- ss.108(1), 119(1), 227(3) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.