Case 2201761/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Soulkitchens Group Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2201761/2021
- Decision date
- 12 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Baty
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Christopher Kyriacou brought claims for unfair dismissal, breach of contract for notice pay and expenses, holiday pay and unlawful deductions from wages against Soulkitchens Group International Ltd. No ET3 was filed and the respondent did not appear. The tribunal allowed an amendment to correct the respondent's name, noted that a Universal Credit reconsideration had accepted that the claimant had not been paid by the respondent, and recorded that the claimant worked as a menu manager from 19 November 2020 to 18 February 2021 on a salary of £31,000 per year.
The unfair dismissal claim was withdrawn at the hearing after the tribunal had sent a strike-out warning because the claimant did not have two years' service. The tribunal dismissed that claim upon withdrawal. For notice, the tribunal found that the probationary period was three months and had not been completed, so the claimant was entitled only to one week's statutory notice under section 86 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It awarded £570 net on that basis. The separate expenses claim for £56 was not allowed because the contract required advance written permission, which was not produced.
On the wages claim, the tribunal accepted that the claimant was entitled to his gross salary and that the first month's payment of £2,107.99 had been made to him personally without statutory deductions and without any payslip. It calculated a first-month shortfall of £475.34 and awarded pay for the remaining two months at £2,583.33 each, totalling £5,642. On holiday pay, it found that the claimant accrued 8.25 days over the employment, took no annual leave, and was entitled to £983.65 calculated on a daily rate of £119.23. The total award was £7,195.65.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claimant withdrew the unfair dismissal claim at the hearing after the tribunal had issued a strike-out warning. The tribunal also noted that he had less than two years' service. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay was awarded at the statutory one-week minimum because the claimant had not completed probation. The separate expenses item for £56 was not awarded because there was no advance written permission. | Upheld | — | £570 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant accrued 8.25 days' holiday over the three-month employment, took no annual leave, and calculated holiday pay at £119.23 per day. | Upheld | — | £984 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal accepted the claimant was entitled to his gross salary, found he had been paid £2,107.99 for the first month without statutory deductions or a payslip, and awarded the salary shortfall together with pay for the remaining two months. | Upheld | — | £5,642 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,196
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 86 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.