Case 2201766/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Czaplewski v Ms A Kowalik — 2020
- Case reference
- 2201766/2020
- Decision date
- 1 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Welch Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Czaplewski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr T Czaplewski was employed by Ms A Kowalik from 17 July 2019 to 13 January 2020, rather than being an intern. It accepted that the parties had agreed pay at £2,500 per month, equivalent to £576.92 per week, and rejected the respondent's case that a lower weekly amount had been agreed.
On wages, the tribunal held that the claimant had been underpaid over the course of the employment. It calculated entitlement on the basis of 25 weeks and 2 days at the accepted weekly rate, producing gross pay due of £14,653.76 against £11,875 actually received, leaving £2,778.76 outstanding as unlawful deductions from wages. The respondent's overpayment and set-off case was rejected.
On holiday pay, the tribunal held that the holiday year ran from the start of employment because no holiday-year agreement had been reached before the written contract was provided on 30 December 2019. It accepted that the claimant was entitled to annual leave from 17 July 2019 to 13 January 2020, credited three Christmas bank holidays as leave taken, and awarded 10.5 days' holiday pay of £1,557.68.
On notice pay and breach of contract, the tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed with immediate effect on 13 January 2020 and was entitled to one week's notice pay. It rejected the respondent's attempt to offset alleged overpayments against that sum, and ordered £576.92 for notice pay together with £75 for unpaid lunches during the notice period, making a total award of £4,988.36 gross subject to deductions.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Calculated on the tribunal's accepted weekly rate of £576.92 for 25 weeks and 2 days; the judgment elsewhere says the claimant started on 17 July 2019, although paragraph 22 refers to 16 July 2019 when summarising the start of employment. | Upheld | — | £2,779 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal held the holiday year ran from the start of employment because no prior agreement fixed it to 1 January to 31 December; it credited three Christmas bank holidays as leave taken and awarded 10.5 days' holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £1,558 |
| Breach of contract | The award comprised £576.92 notice pay plus £75 for unpaid lunches during the notice period. | Upheld | — | £652 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,988
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.