Case 2201771/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Milusauskaite v Be The Air Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2201771/2019
- Decision date
- 18 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brown Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Milusauskaite
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, the tribunal determined that Be The Air Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Miss S Milusauskaite’s wages. It ordered the respondent to pay £1,888.80 net, calculated from £2,369.94 unpaid wages less £481.14 already received.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £332.16 in damages. A further finding was made that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement, and it was ordered to pay £166.08. The judgment does not set out any broader remedy calculation beyond these three sums.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the net sum, calculated as £2,369.94 unpaid wages less £481.14 received. | Upheld | — | £1,889 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages for that breach. | Upheld | — | £332 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of that sum. | Upheld | — | £166 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,387
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.