Case 2201807/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Larangeira v Vasco Rafael dos Santos Barbaca — 2020
- Case reference
- 2201807/2020
- Decision date
- 23 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicolle JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Respondent did not file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance by the required date of 29 June 2020 and did not seek an extension of time. Employment Judge Nicolle therefore determined the claim on the papers under Rule 21, without a hearing.
On the ET1, the Tribunal found that the Respondent had unlawfully failed to pay wages to the Claimant for seven ten-hour shifts worked between 10 and 20 December 2019. At an hourly rate of £10, the unpaid gross wages totalled £700.
The Tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay the Claimant £700 gross in unpaid wages. It recorded that the Claimant would be responsible for applicable tax and employee national insurance contributions on that sum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Tribunal made a Rule 21 judgment after the Respondent failed to file an ET3. It found that the Respondent had unlawfully failed to pay wages for seven ten-hour shifts worked between 10 and 20 December 2019, and ordered payment of £700 gross. | Upheld | — | £700 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £700
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.