Case 2201825/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Uddin v NSL Limited Heard : CVP — 2023
- Case reference
- 2201825/2023
- Decision date
- 24 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sutton KC
- Panel members
- Ms H. Craik, Dr V. Weerasinghe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Uddin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 18-20 and 23 October 2023 before Employment Judge Sutton KC, Ms H. Craik and Dr V. Weerasinghe, the Tribunal by majority found that Mr A Uddin's complaint of unfair dismissal was not well founded and dismissed it. Dr Weerasinghe dissented on that issue.
The Tribunal unanimously dismissed the Claimant's complaint of unlawful discrimination and his breach of contract complaint. The extracted judgment records the outcomes only and does not set out detailed reasons, the discrimination ground, or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | By a majority; Dr Weerasinghe dissented. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The extracted judgment records a complaint of unlawful discrimination, but does not specify the legal basis or protected characteristic. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.